Sounds like you guys have it figured out; conditional reading forms cannot be ignored, only their results.
Just wanted to make sure, had some bad times with it heh On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:48:28 PM UTC+3, Alex Miller wrote: > > I think what you're seeing here makes sense. > > On Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 3:39:15 PM UTC-5, whodidthis wrote: >> >> Are there any thoughts on code like this: >> >> #_ >> > > This says to ignore the next read form.... > > >> #?(:cljs (def unrelated-1 nil)) >> > > This evaluates to *nothing*, ie nothing is read, so it is not ignored by > the #_. > > >> #?(:cljs (def unrelated-2 nil)) >> #?(:cljs (def unrelated-3 nil)) >> > > These also read as *nothing*. > > >> #?(:clj (def n 10)) >> > > This *is* read, but ignored per the prior #_ > > #?(:clj (defn num [] n)) >> ; compile on clj =>RuntimeException: Unable to resolve symbol: n >> > > And then this makes sense. > > >> >> I guess it's fine if it continues to work that way but I can imagine it >> being a little surprising from time to time heh >> > > Conditional reading is definitely something to be careful about - I think > in this case you are combining two types of conditional reading so be > doubly careful. :) > > To get the effect you want in this, using #_ *inside* the reader > conditional would work: > > #?(:cljs #_(def unrelated-1 nil)) > > > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
