I can't speak to the analogy with Common Lisp. I talked to a few people at Clojure/west who shared the same concerns about fragmenting resources for Clojure & ClojureScript.
I just think the present reality is that ClojureScript has enough differences from Clojure to make their conflation a confusing enough affair for prospective JS/front-enders. And I think having that first-class website experience for CLJS is going to be valuable when compared to the standard set by other compile-to-JS languages like TypeScript and Dart, which have excellent websites. On Friday, May 1, 2015 at 2:51:27 PM UTC-5, Gary Schiltz wrote: > On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:45:03 AM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote: > > No plans at the moment for an official ClojureScript site. There are some > > community led efforts underway which we whole-heartedly encourage! > > > > > > David > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Benjamin Dreux <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm pretty new to Clojurescript. > > > > And i feel a little bit weird the way to get information on the projet, > > environment, etc > > > > > > > > I think staring would be easier if there was a reference point. > > > > > > > > I' aware that there is pretty much every thing I need could be found in > > this wiki (https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki). But i'm looking > > for something prettier, more graphical. > > > > > > > > Does this conversation already happened? > > > > Is this on purpose, to not replicate the clojure.org website? > > > > Am I the only one having this idea? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > > > --- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "ClojureScript" group. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to [email protected]. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > > Separate sites for Clojure and ClojureScript seems strange to me. I was > thinking that in time, the two languages would start getting more alike > rather than diverging. The more divergence, the more opportunity there is for > territoriality for the "Clojure" name. I'd sure hate to see anything like > what one sees on the Common Lisp newsgroup crrep into the Clojure landscape... -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
