On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gary Schiltz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Separate sites for Clojure and ClojureScript seems strange to me. I was > thinking that in time, the two languages would start getting more alike > rather than diverging. The more divergence, the more opportunity there is > for territoriality for the "Clojure" name. I'd sure hate to see anything > like what one sees on the Common Lisp newsgroup crrep into the Clojure > landscape... I suspect Clojure and ClojureScript will one day have a unified official presentation. But who knows when that will be? There's only so much time in the day and higher priorities have been getting in the way for *years* now. So why wait when the problem is in fact addressable today via community effort? Even if such an official presentation did land I suspect community led efforts will emphasize things the official thing do not. For example there are quite a few distinct Clojure documentation efforts that provide considerable value over the autodocs generated from the Clojure repositories. I applaud the community for taking matters into their own hands :) David -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
