> We are not adding any new functions for dealing with objects. Use goog.object.
Judging by the number of people I've seen reach for `aget` out of convenience, I might suggest that object property access is a common enough use case to be worth at least considering a sanctioned util for? Nested reads using `goog.object` is cumbersome and tricky to get right; it would seem unfortunate to me if folks ended up resorting to writing their own adhoc wrappers (or just kept on using `aget` which can be error prone in surprising ways). I'd encourage you to reconsider a PR to allow the idea to at least sit with you for a bit? Entirely your call though, of course :-) Thanks again for all your input & patience on this. Cheers! Here's `oget` again for anyone else that might find it handy: https://gist.github.com/ptaoussanis/2556c56d93bde4af0415 -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
