As I said we're never going to add anything for this. Consider this the official statement about the matter :)
David On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Peter Taoussanis <[email protected]> wrote: > > We are not adding any new functions for dealing with objects. Use > goog.object. > > Judging by the number of people I've seen reach for `aget` out of > convenience, I might suggest that object property access is a common enough > use case to be worth at least considering a sanctioned util for? > > Nested reads using `goog.object` is cumbersome and tricky to get right; it > would seem unfortunate to me if folks ended up resorting to writing their > own adhoc wrappers (or just kept on using `aget` which can be error prone > in surprising ways). > > I'd encourage you to reconsider a PR to allow the idea to at least sit > with you for a bit? Entirely your call though, of course :-) > > Thanks again for all your input & patience on this. Cheers! > > Here's `oget` again for anyone else that might find it handy: > https://gist.github.com/ptaoussanis/2556c56d93bde4af0415 > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
