On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Peter Taoussanis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If you have to fall through so many cases to get to the Object case why > would you not just use `goog.object/get`? > > So the concern isn't a performance regression against current uses of > `get`, but about `get` being inefficient relative to plain > `goog.object/get` for objects - is that correct? No. You're still damaging anyone in the final cases - native extenders and those who just fall completely through. David -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
