In that case it looks like a simple contribution and in my opinion may not need to go through IP clearance process. Folks if you have objection to this assessment please call out.
Thanks Animesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [mailto:vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:45 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-778] Feedback requested > > Hi Animesh, > > The feature has changes amounting to about 150 lines of code. It was intended > specifically for vCenter deployments that would allow users to append guest > VM instance names to the internal names shown on the hypervisor (i.e., in > vCenter), if a global flag vm.instancename.flag is turned on, during guest VM > creation. The feature however works on all hypervisors and has been coded > that way, but it doesn't impinge on any existing CS functionality and should > be > easy to merge into ACS. The only part that may need to be done differently is > in > the upgrade scripts from the previous ACS version to the current one, and that > would only involve putting in a new global flag. > > Regards, > Vijay > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:24 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-778] Feedback requested > > Vijay > > This issue was flagged for potential IP clearance issue. Please provide some > more details on this issue and approximate effort in LOC needed to address > this > issue. Community needs to determine the contribution effort and then call out > whether it needs to go through IP clearance. > > > Thanks > Animesh > > > Chip Childers reopened CLOUDSTACK-778: > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > Reopening, since we (1) don't have the code in the repo and (2) need > > to sort out the ip ownership questions on this feature before > > inclusion. Please feel free to submit to reviewboard, but note that > > we should NOT commit until ip clearance is complete. > >
