Thanks for the write-up, One comment, Is there any reason not use link-local IPv4 address?
>*User VM would have one link-local IPv6 address > -----Original Message----- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:11 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) > > Hi, > > The first draft of IPv6 FS is available at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+support > now. > > Basically based on our previous discussion, we would like to stick to > dnsmasq, and assume shared network for advance zone in the phase one, > to make thing as simple as possible in phase 1. > > Comments/questions are welcome! > > --Sheng
