On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Anthony Xu <xuefei...@citrix.com> wrote: > More comments, > > Can VM access VM by name on IPv6 network( router VM provide DNS service ?)?
Yes, dnsmasq would provide AAAA records. > Is password-reset service supported on IPv6 network? Should be in the future, but not phase 1, which only provide DNS and DHCP. > Is meta-data and user-data service supported on IPv6 network? Not phase 1. > Is external network device (F5, SRX) supported on IPv6 network? Not in the plan. > What's the impact for Security enabled shared network? Not in the plan. Only support shared network without SG in the phase 1. > What's the impact for multiple IPs per NIC? I guess we may no longer need to have another nic for different public subnet, but need to be confirmed. --Sheng > > Anthony > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:26 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) >> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Xu <xuefei...@citrix.com> >> wrote: >> > My misunderstanding, I thought that's the link-local ip in Xenserver >> or KVM:-) >> > >> > If a VM is on both IPv6 and IPv4 network, what's the link-local >> address? IPv4? IPv6? Both? >> >> For dual stack case, we still require IPv6 link-local address only. >> >> --Sheng >> > >> > >> > Anthony >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:13 AM >> >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Anthony Xu <xuefei...@citrix.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Thanks for the write-up, >> >> > >> >> > One comment, >> >> > Is there any reason not use link-local IPv4 address? >> >> > >> >> >>*User VM would have one link-local IPv6 address >> >> >> >> IPv6 required one auto configured link local address per nic(means >> >> likely one nic would have more than one IP address, and in the >> >> different subnet), and the link local address would be used to send >> >> out DHCP request etc(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3315). It's also >> >> the basic of Neighbor discovery mechanism in >> >> IPv6(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861). >> >> >> >> I think IPv4 link-local is less relevant in this case... >> >> >> >> --Sheng >> >> > >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:11 PM >> >> >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> Subject: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> The first draft of IPv6 FS is available at >> >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+support >> >> >> now. >> >> >> >> >> >> Basically based on our previous discussion, we would like to >> stick >> >> to >> >> >> dnsmasq, and assume shared network for advance zone in the phase >> one, >> >> >> to make thing as simple as possible in phase 1. >> >> >> >> >> >> Comments/questions are welcome! >> >> >> >> >> >> --Sheng
