My misunderstanding, I thought that's the link-local ip in Xenserver or KVM:-)
If a VM is on both IPv6 and IPv4 network, what's the link-local address? IPv4? IPv6? Both? Anthony > -----Original Message----- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:13 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Anthony Xu <xuefei...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > Thanks for the write-up, > > > > One comment, > > Is there any reason not use link-local IPv4 address? > > > >>*User VM would have one link-local IPv6 address > > IPv6 required one auto configured link local address per nic(means > likely one nic would have more than one IP address, and in the > different subnet), and the link local address would be used to send > out DHCP request etc(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3315). It's also > the basic of Neighbor discovery mechanism in > IPv6(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861). > > I think IPv4 link-local is less relevant in this case... > > --Sheng > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:11 PM > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> The first draft of IPv6 FS is available at > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+support > >> now. > >> > >> Basically based on our previous discussion, we would like to stick > to > >> dnsmasq, and assume shared network for advance zone in the phase one, > >> to make thing as simple as possible in phase 1. > >> > >> Comments/questions are welcome! > >> > >> --Sheng
