On Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 04:55 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The 4.0.1-incubating release only had one database change > (91a9cce35a67350c856bb10e5fe36f4bf5bac029) so it's probably a good > time to decide on a strategy for upgrades from the 4.0.x line to the > 4.x-5.0 line.
That particular issue might benefit from a separate thread, since it's something that needs to be discussed regardless of what support timeline we decide on. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/