On Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 04:55 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> The 4.0.1-incubating release only had one database change
> (91a9cce35a67350c856bb10e5fe36f4bf5bac029) so it's probably a good
> time to decide on a strategy for upgrades from the 4.0.x line to the
> 4.x-5.0 line.

That particular issue might benefit from a separate thread, since it's
something that needs to be discussed regardless of what support timeline
we decide on. 

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Reply via email to