2012/2/28  <du...@identicalsoftware.com>:
>> Maybe Lucene++ [1] supports this. It is a port of a later Lucene version
>> by
>> Alan and Ben. We tried once to make this the new CLucene version, but
>> havn't finished it yet.
>
> How stable is Lucene++? Does it just have some unimplemented functionality
> from java lucene or is there other problems?

Sorry for coming back to your question so late. Somehow I thought, I
had already answered it. As far as I know Lucene++ is stable. For
CLucene we wanted it as fast as possible, i.e., reducing the usage of
the shared pointers in Lucene++.

Kind regards,
Veit

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
CLucene-developers mailing list
CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers

Reply via email to