2012/2/28 <du...@identicalsoftware.com>: >> Maybe Lucene++ [1] supports this. It is a port of a later Lucene version >> by >> Alan and Ben. We tried once to make this the new CLucene version, but >> havn't finished it yet. > > How stable is Lucene++? Does it just have some unimplemented functionality > from java lucene or is there other problems?
Sorry for coming back to your question so late. Somehow I thought, I had already answered it. As far as I know Lucene++ is stable. For CLucene we wanted it as fast as possible, i.e., reducing the usage of the shared pointers in Lucene++. Kind regards, Veit ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list CLucene-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers