I can just imagine how easy it would be to frame someone... This is nonesense, we need to write them a letter(s).
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Berenbaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:52 AM Subject: RE: (clug-talk) Will Canada's ISPs become spies? > > I find the most offensive part the extensive logging of sites visited. > Why should my upstream provider be keeping track of which websites I've > visited for the past 6 months? To combat terrorism? that's just the > excuse we've now become accustomed to. I feel invaded just thinking about > it. > > Now I do agree with Cameron.... I imagine the government has a way to peek > inside the networks right now if they feel it's necessary.... but this > would probably give them a little more leeway, and legitimize the demise > of online privacy in Canada. Scary Stuff. > > Michael. > > > -------Original Message------- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: August 28, 2002 12:26:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: (clug-talk) Will Canada's ISPs become spies? > > That is disturbing in so many ways...but I have often thought that these > things are annouced as being a possibility after they have already been > implemented. > > Case in point: A few years ago there was a big annoucement tht the Hells > Angels would be locating in Calgary. If people only knew that they were in > Calgary at least five years before hand. I of course have no concrete > proof, but I have the information on good authority and would believe it > to > be true. The same goes for the article here and that it islikely in action > already. Anyone rememeber that "Big Brother" government databse that was > in > the news a year or so ago? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Bruseker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: August 28, 2002 12:10 AM > To: CLUG talk > Subject: (clug-talk) Will Canada's ISPs become spies? > > > Yipes, I say, yipes. > > http://news.com.com/2100-1023-955595.html > > Ian > > . >
