Mark Lane a �crit: > At 12:52 PM 9/22/02, you wrote: > >> Actually...Canada is a democratic facist regime. > > > Uhm, no. A Fascist Regime requires strong nationalistic support from > population to gain power. Canada has never had that.
What about all those "I am Canadian Adds?" ...though if it came down to it, I would vote for John Sleeman. > > Also if I remember my social studies 20 class correctly, Fascists don't > not believe in social programs only survival of the fittest (as long as > they happen to be of the same race as the people in the government) > unless you consider genocide a social program. Canada has social > programs and in some cases too many. Facism doesn't imply any sort of racism. But yeah, a Facist government would be somewhat like the states, but without elections...so the difference would be that people would _know_ they have no real say. But given the fact that Bush technicallly lost the elections, and hist cousin is the Florida Senator and ...... > > Canada's problem is that Cretien can do anything he wants with > impunity. The scandals over his riding in Quebec should have had him > kicked out ( or even in prison ) but no he is still in power because we > have given the PM too much power. No one can criticize him or not vote > his way or they are out of the Liberal caucus. > > Just remember, Chr�tien was elected, he has a huge majority because he has the support of most of the country. And the scandals were pathetic, basically every other party really has nothing to complain about, so they complain about that, and make up conspiracies and whatnot. To me, it sounds like those idiots who still think man hasn't been to the moon, that is was all a big conspiracy.
