-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 27 September 2002 02:54, you wrote:
> If I might jump in here, how about experience?  I have a server at work
> that has an 18 GB Quantum SCSI drive (purchased 1999) and a 20 GB IBM IDE
> drive (purchased 2000).  They are set up as mirrored drives.  Why not both
> SCSI? Boss got cheap when I told him we should have some reduncancy.  :-)

heh... thank goodness for _software_ raid, hm?

aren't Quantum drives put out by Maxtor? and isn't the Quantum line killed? if 
my memory is serving me right on this, what you are seeing is the difference 
between a middle of the road hard disk manufacturer whose speciality is not 
really high end drives (maxtor) versus a top flight disk manu who caters to 
the enterprise (IBM). 

> Anyway, I've had to replace the SCSI drive 3 times (you should hear the
> sounds it makes when it dies - really cool). 

yeah, dieing drives are generally pretty neat. 

> IDE has never died.  In my mind, SCSI sucks.  
> More money, lower quality.  Thank God I had the IDE mirror or I'd be hooped.  

which is, of course, why everyone who sets up serious data systems uses SCSI 
if they are going with a commodity solution? right. maybe you should start 
calling data centre around the world and letting them know. ;-)

seriously though, SCSI is generally better than IDE. the gap has narrowed 
CONSIDERABLY over the years, however. primarilly because of the HUGE market 
for IDE drives, ergo the increased R&D budgets. you can primarily thank a 
certain company in Redmond and another associated with the colour blue for 
that. had the same efforts been put into SCSI, not only would the prices be 
what they are for IDE, we'd probably have larger, faster and more reliable 
drives today. SCSI technology has not topped out, is more scalable and had a 
head start on IDE.

- -- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"
    - Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9lM8U1rcusafx20MRAqq+AJ4t3GODgJiRenyOLDnS5QLbZ5cAzQCdGMr8
D+fESl8QaTNIUwgHDWieFxE=
=yVmr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to