Jesse,

Not a bad idea (the Red Carpet idea), but alas, no X, which Red Carpet
requires, doesn't it?  I wanted to see what I could make of SuSE for a DNS
server on an old dual-P133, so I don't want or need X on the machine.

The programs you are thinking of to keep multiple systems up-to-date, are
you thinking of SuSE specific ones?  Got a name for them?  Are they a push
type thing, instead of pull like YOU on a cron job?

As for the mailing list, if I do decide to stick with SuSE for this machine,
then I'd probably subscribe to them, but I want to know that it works first.
:-)

And before anyone says "well if SuSE drives you so crazy, use another
distro", this machine is a little picky - it has an odd AMD SCSI system,
it's a dual-P133 which is also odd - and I have already tried several:
RedHat won't even boot the installer, Mandrake was ok, but slow compared to
SuSE, OpenBSD is highly unstable, NetBSD I just don't know enough about, and
then there is FreeBSD - it's the only thing I've been able to run that is
stable, but I like Linux.  :-)  I have a few of the same machine, and I want
to make use of them in small infrastructure jobs like firewalling, bridging
and DNS, so I want something I'd be happy rolling out to more than one
machine.

Thanks for your advice.

Ian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse Kline [mailto:klinej@;telus.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: (clug-talk) For the life of me I can't figure YOU out
>
>
> Well in that case, I'm not sure I can help you. I think that in
> general YAST2 is
> a good admin system. One option that you do have is to monitor
> updates yourself.
> I'm sure that SuSE has a security mailing list or web site that
> you can monitor
> these thing son. That might be a pain in the ass if you are
> running just one
> system, but if you have multiple systems there are programs that
> will apply your
> updates to all the systems. Another option that you have is to
> install an older
> version of SuSE and use Red Carpet to keep it up to date. Red Carpet is
> available for SuSE 7.3 and 8.0 from
> http://www.ximian.com/products/redcarpet/download.html this will
> keep your base
> system as well as your Gnome desktop and other components up to
> date. Give it a try.
>
> Jesse
>
> Quoting Ian Bruseker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Yes, the patches thing is nice (not that I care, cable modem
> and all, but
> > it's a nice touch).  I tried both the automatic and the manual,
> they both
> > do
> > that same thing in terms of selection.  And like I said, I ftp'd to the
> > same
> > mirror I was using for the update, so that I was sure that I
> was seeing the
> > same thing YOU was seeing, and still it didn't pick up all the updates.
> > It's like it's trying to be really smart (the patches thing was
> a big hint
> > that they are _trying_ to be really smart) but just not quite
> succeeding.
> > It just worries me that if I do decide to go with SuSE for a system, I
> > can't
> > trust it to be up-to-date.  It's kinda sad, actually.  As the poster in
> > Mulder's office says, "I want to believe".  Their distro looks nice
> > otherwise, but the only thing that truly differentiates distros
> these days
> > is their admin tools, and if YOU is completely useless, then
> that's a big
> > blow against them.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jesse Kline [mailto:klinej@;telus.net]
> > > Sent: Wedne
>
> sday, October 30, 2002 10:41 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: (clug-talk) For the life of me I can't figure YOU out
> > >
> > >
> > > heh, I've never had any problems with YOU myself. In fact I think
> > > it works quite
> > > well. The ting that I like is that it downloads paths instead of
> > > the whole RPM,
> > > this makes updates go much faster. I also only have
> experience with the X
> > > version. You have two options, one is to look for updates and
> > > then select the
> > > ones you want to install, or let YOU do the whole thing for you.
> > > I always chose
> > > the automated approach as it made the easier. YOU will download a
> > > list of all
> > > the updates, even updates for packages that are not installed on
> > > your system. I
> > > wouldn't pay any attention to this, just wait until it has
> > > finnished and then
> > > look at the packages that it actually installed. One thing that I
> > > did notice is
> > > that not all of their mirrors are up to date. This may be why you
> > > find updates
> > > on the SuSE ftp site that are not being installed. Install all
> > > the updates, and
> > > then try the other mirrors to see if any of them install updates
> > > that were not
> > > installed on the firt go around.
> > >
> > > Jesse
> > >
> > > Quoting Ian Bruseker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > > Catchy subject, non?  :-)
> > > >
> > > > What I really mean is YaST Online Update.  What is up with that
> > > > program?  I've tried using SuSE several times in the past,
> only to give
> > > > up based on the (apparent) stupidity of this one program.
> But so many
> > > > people use SuSE, that it tells me either there are a whole lot more
> > > > tolerant people in this world than I think that are willing
> to put up
> > > > with this thing, or I just fundamentally misunderstand what this
> > program
> > > > is all about.  Let's go with option 2 for now.
> > > >
> > > > As best I can tell, this program is supposed to connect to
> an FTP site,
> > > > look at the available update rpms, and let you install the updates.
> > > > Further, it looks like it is _supposed_ to preselect items
> for update
> > > > that apply to your system.  This seems pretty straight forward, and
> > > > pretty common (RedHat has RHN, Mandrake has Mandrake
> Update, etc).  So,
> > > > Monday night I did an FTP install of SuSE 8.1 on an old machine.
> > > > Install went fine.  Ran YOU after the setup was done, it
> preselected 3
> > > > packages out of the several dozen listed that have been
> updated.  (Oh,
> > > > this is all ncurses based, not X, the machine's a bit
> underpowered for
> > > > that).  I let it do the updates, but I get curious - why so many
> > > > packages that _don't_ need to be updated.  Some stuff is obviously
> > > > updates that could never apply to the system in question
> (KDE updates,
> > > > for example - not a single KDE rpm is installed - why is it
> showing me
> > > > this?  YaST Onine _UPDATE_.  Show me updates, not things that aren't
> > > > even installed on my system, but whatever, that's the subject of
> > another
> > > > rant).  So I ftp to the site that YOU had used and check the updates
> > > > there, doing much 'rpm -qa|grep' on another console.  Some stuff is
> > > > already up-to-date.  I'm guessing SuSE updates their main
> FTP install
> > > > directory so a clean install comes out fairly up-to-date.
> That's cool.
> > > > But there are other packages on my system that are clearly not up to
> > the
> > > > latest version compared to the FTP site.  But YOU isn't
> autoselecting
> > > > them when I run it.  It seems when I run YOU I have flip to another
> > > > console/ ftp to the site YOU is using/check the rpms
> there/rpm -qa|grep
> > > > on another console/and manually select the updates in YOU.  Am I
> > missing
> > > > something here?  If I have to do the ftp/check/grep thing,
> then what's
> > > > the point of YOU?  I can download things manually and just
> do it that
> > > > way (I'm already FTP'd in, after all).  Isn't YOU supposed
> to help with
> > > > this in some way, not make the process longer and more painful?  Is
> > > > there a checkbox somewhere I missed?  A magic chant, perhaps?
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the long and ranty email.  Abject stupidity gets me very
> > > > frustrated late at night (that includes my own abject stupidity if
> > > > someone can show me exactly what it is about YOU that makes
> it in any
> > > > way useful).  Does anyone have any experience with/understanding of
> > this
> > > > program that would help me make it something other than a complete
> > waste
> > > > of my time?  I'm asking here before submitting a bug to SuSE that
> > simple
> > > > reads "YOU suck(s)".  ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Ian
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to