I want my clients to run a Linux that is like the one I do so I can support them better. Debian is great but I don't think it would be good to recomend to clients new to Linux so I recomend Mandrake.

I alos don't like Debian system structure, I can't find any thing.

On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 11:21, Cade Cairns wrote:
uhm why dont you run debian or a more server-centric distribution on your
servers?

Regards,
Cade Cairns

On 31 Oct 2002, Roy Souther wrote:

> Red Hat 8 is the reason I am switching my servers to Mandrake.
>
> On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 11:09, Kevin Anderson wrote:
>
>     No need for advice or anything, but Red Hat 8 sucks.
>
>     KDE is TOTALLY wacked.  Why even include it if they're going to make it that
>     bad.  Gnome has bribed the right people.
>
>     But more importantly, IT PISSES ME OFF that ACL support isn't built in like
>     it was in all the betas.
>
>     It's bad enough that Reiser and/or XFS aren't natively supported.  At least
>     they could provide the full feature set for ext3.
>
>     (picture me kicking the desk, server, wiping my butt with a printout of the
>     Shadowman, etc...)
>
>     If I wanted a half complete OS, I'd install XP.  Then I can even give up
>     Journaling on the file system.
>
>     I'm not 100% sure I'm cocky enough to go with Gentoo.
>
>     Damn it, I want ACL support on a VFS filesystem.  Is that so much to ask?
>
>     And I don't want to rebuild the kernel, cause that sort of documentation
>     just blows.
>
>     FSCK
>
>     </rant>
>
>     Kev.
>
>
>
> Roy Souther
> www.SiliconTao.com
>
> Changing the way people do business.
>
>

Roy Souther
www.SiliconTao.com

Changing the way people do business.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to