Hi Aaron, I was about to remove the links myself, but then I thought it's not up to me to decide what's offensive and not (where do you draw the line?).
And maybe, somebody else (not even a member of the group) put these links on there. And maybe, somebody else will (could) add/edit a link to an offensive site tomorrow or next week or next month for my membership entry (or yours?). So basically, I wanted to create awareness for these kind of problems (and I'm sure it will happen again, as long as we do not monitor it or use some kind of access restrictions). I'm glad to hear about the new development for the membership list. Holger. -----Original Message----- From: Aaron J. Seigo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 1, 2002 11:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Membership List -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 01 December 2002 11:01, Johnny Stork wrote: > Possibly a bit more control over the editing of content on this page would > prevent some obvious abuses from occuring i've removed the offensive links (something anyone could've done, really). this won't be an issue in the near future as the membership list will not be handled by the WIKI engine in short order.. - -- Aaron J. Seigo GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler" - Albert Einstein -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE96k+O1rcusafx20MRAg2xAKCB4CmdebAG1LL6iihpfQccDG/sNQCggR00 G9rycP0KuDyGamuJ+RaXRdw= =RvP/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
