Our Compaqs take FOREVER to go through their hardware song and dance (well,
actually just to spin up the drives in their arrays.)

This would let us compile a kernel, and test it out, without needing to
reboot the box...  That's cool.

Kev.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Linux Work


> On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 19:41, Richard Jenniss wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 02:08:30 -0700 (MST)
> > Trevor Lauder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, but technically you aren't running your install because you're
still
> > > have the kernel from the boot media (CD-ROM or whatever) loaded.  You
can
> > > use the OS, true.
> >
> > I do not understand the technicality.
> >
> > We agree you can use the OS, so that's cool.
> > I don't see the problem with the installer and the boot media.
> >
> > Does this have to do with being read-only?
> >
> > I see this in my lilo.conf
> >
> > image=/boot/bzImage
> >         label=linux2
> >         root=/dev/hda1
> >         read-only
> >
> > Could pivot root, and remounting a r/o drive to r/w be different?
> >
> Because the kernel for your install may not be the same as the kernel
> used by the installer. Also unless you reboot to the installed kernel,
> you can't verify that the install worked properly. It would be pretty
> bad if didn't reboot after an install and find out that a writing error
> corrupted kernel 3 weeks later during a power outage.
>
> Now it is possible to do a 2 kernel monty to switch kernels on a running
> system but technically that is still a form of a reboot. It requires all
> services to be shutdown and causes the system to boot (partial boot as
> memory isn't cleared) to a kernel in a different memory location than
> the current running kernel. A two kernel monty is generally used in a
> big network boot environment to determine which kernel should be loaded
> (ie Intel/Athlon SMP/NON-SMP.) Now this would still be useless with an
> install as it doesn't test the lilo or grub install.
>
>
>

Reply via email to