-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 December 2002 11:22, Roy Souther wrote:
> That is not true. Many documents, books and other educational materials
> are published under some form of a GNU license.
the FDL is a GNU license. specifically for documentation because the FSF
realized that people were using licenses such as the GPL/LGPL for things they
are not appropriate for (and therefore do not properly protect) such as
documentation.
> True that there are
> other licenses for documents but many authors that choose GNU licensing
> for their work do so to show support for the GNU effort. There are
> things about publishing documents under GNU licenses that I don't like,
> but do this because it helps to raise awareness of GNU and makes it
> easier to introduce other GNU works to people.
this is admirable and i like the concept. i would only suggest using an
appropriate GNU license.
- --
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"
- Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE98OwL1rcusafx20MRAshrAJ0VP+zaXF/Dn1yfhLjAls5WimQBiACgmsXf
5ZWV+sKMMQqevSo1qx6mJGY=
=wO6G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
