Probably the best bet is to exit this thread, since it has no value to anyone and is only designed to start an argument.
Kev. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cade Cairns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 2:12 PM Subject: Re: (clug-talk) crossover cables > uh, that's not very logical at all. if the cables cross at both ends, it's > the same as both not crossing. maybe you shuold go back to simple system > administration tasks. > > Regards, > Cade Cairns > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Kevin Anderson wrote: > > > No. There will be no communication because you are transmitting on the same > > two wires from each end, and the recieving wires are dead at each end. > > > > Kev. > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Garth Meisel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:56 AM > > Subject: Re: (clug-talk) crossover cables > > > > > > > OK, hold up here. Everybody is going bezerk and all I asked was one > > simple > > > question. I'll ask it again. > > > > > > Will a hub perform properly with all crossover cables instead of regular > > > (straight thru) cables? > > > > > > This has nothing to do with what the normal is or how things SHOULD be > > done in > > > an ideal world. I just want to know if the hub and everything would > > function > > > with crossovers everywhere instead of regular straight thru cables. That > > > means a crossover feeding the hub and crossovers to the systems hooked to > > the > > > hub. > > > > > > > > > > >
