Nice comment Cade...geez you can be a real pecker-head somethime!  Maybe you
should put your head into a book on manners instead of having it rammed up
your ass!

-----Original Message-----
From: Cade Cairns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 10, 2003 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (clug-talk) crossover cables


uh, that's not very logical at all. if the cables cross at both ends, it's
the same as both not crossing. maybe you shuold go back to simple system
administration tasks.

Regards,
Cade Cairns

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Kevin Anderson wrote:

> No.  There will be no communication because you are transmitting on the
same
> two wires from each end, and the recieving wires are dead at each end.
>
> Kev.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Garth Meisel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:56 AM
> Subject: Re: (clug-talk) crossover cables
>
>
> > OK, hold up here.  Everybody is going bezerk and all I asked was one
> simple
> > question.  I'll ask it again.
> >
> > Will a hub perform properly with all crossover cables instead of regular
> > (straight thru) cables?
> >
> > This has nothing to do with what the normal is or how things SHOULD be
> done in
> > an ideal world.  I just want to know if the hub and everything would
> function
> > with crossovers everywhere instead of regular straight thru cables.
That
> > means a crossover feeding the hub and crossovers to the systems hooked
to
> the
> > hub.
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to