So any thoughts as to what we are presenting next week? On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:13:06PM -0600, Jarrod Major wrote: > Hey Gang, > > I think Craig, John and Jeff's ideas are great. > > A fifteen minute presentation is perfectly acceptable. We don't have to go a > full hour for these and arguably the longer they are the less interested > people are as time goes by. These presentations were only meant to be fast > introduction kind of stuff, nothing too in-depth. > > Having said that, I certainly don't mean to discourage anyone from doing > longer presentations. If you get the right presenter, it can work very well. > And this is not meant as a slight against any of the past presenters. I > thank you all again for stepping forward and volunteering to share this > information with the group. It has made a significant difference to our > meetings. People appreciate the topics you cover, myself included. > > We definitely want to try and always have a backup presentation in the > wings, there's no reason that we can't have a few. > > Keep up the great work everyone! > > Now would be a good time to make any suggestions as to what kind of > presentations you would like to see. This way we can hopefully match up > topics with people willing to present them. > > Jarrod Major > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Craig McLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:38 AM > Subject: Re: (clug-talk) Presentation Topics > > > > I've been toying with some presentation topics as well. > > > > My suggestions for some I'd be interested in doing. > > > > 1: What is coming in Linux 2.6. > > 2: Linux Virtual Memory Manager, what is all the fuss about > > 3: Linux Scheduler, what is all the fuss about > > > > Also I've been thinking it would be neat to do some mini presentations. > > Something that would only take twenty minutes, and would be done before or > > after the nights main presentation. These could be done on UNIX/LINUX > > commands that are more complicated then ls but less complicated then awk. > > > > 1: CRON > > 2: AT > > 3: ANACRON > > > > Those are my ideas. >
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
