-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 15 October 2003 11:02, Shawn wrote:
> I was thinking Suse or Mandrake would do the trick.  Anyone have any
> comments, or reasons I shouldn't consider these?  I'd like to make her
> Linux experience as smooth as possible.  (oh, I don't have all the specs
> for the box either, but I think it's a P300.)

depends on how much hard drive space she has. IME Mandrake fits neatly on a 
smaller disk (e.g. <= 3GB) , but isn't as swift as SUSE. SUSE wants more disk 
space, but is faster and kinder on the RAM. unfortunate trade off, by a trade 
off all the same.

i would not recommend Red Hat as a newbie desktop unless you do some 
considerable tweaking. most people expect their desktops to play mp3s, for 
instance.

no matter what you install, i would recommend grabbing OOo 1.1 and installing 
that as it is faster. i wouldn't recommend Mozilla at all. if you're going to 
be running KDE, she can use Konqueror. if GNOME, galeon or epiphane. perhaps 
install Pheonix as a back-up browser.

i also recommend sticking to apps of one desktop or another, as that'll 
decrease RAM pressure and increase consistency. obviously there isn't much 
you can do about OOo or Moz apps, but for mail, etc. it really does make a 
difference on older hardware.

> On a different note, I finally got Zope and Plone running, and my website

whee! =)

- -- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/jjpO1rcusafx20MRAv2/AJ9L6z2DocigYqtJbs58IBTnn2xx+wCgr3nG
ho5akYQVngQRYUuPAK4iCuk=
=L3QB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to