On November 1, 2003 10:13 pm, Trevor Lauder wrote:
> Nick W said:
> > On November 1, 2003 02:12 pm, Bogi wrote:
> >> Hi Nick.
> >> 64 Megs should be enough for compile. But only for a single task, not 2
> >> paralell. Btw you should only select that option if you have a dual cpu
> >> system according to the documentation.
> >
> > Hmmm, I thought it said number of CPUs + 1...my bad?
>
> Yes, that setting should be CPUs + 1. You can set it to 2 on a single
> processor machine and the compile time should be less.... although I'm not
> sure how a p166 with 64 Megs of RAM would handle that kind of stress :)
> Something like binutils would take quite a bit of memory to compile I
> think so setting it back to 1 might fix your problem.
Setting it to 1 generated a whole new set of errors, but I still got out of
memory.
...
Out of Memory: Killed process 11849 (cc1)
gcc: Internal error: Terminated (program cc1)
Please send a full bug report
See <URL:bugs.gentoo.org/> for instructions //been there, nothing helpful
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}: 27511: Warning: end of file not on new line; newline
inserted
....(normal make errors and exit msgs)
!!!Error: sys-devel/binutils-2.14.90.0.6-r6 failed
!!!Function src_compile, line 140, exit code 2
!!!(no error message)
{standard input}: 29667: Error: bad register name '%b'
Other than that, after the shell script updates my portage tree I get a
message to replace my make.globals file (no, I didn't edit it ;) but of
course the script is running so I can't replace it at that moment.
Could there be something in the USE flags screwing it up? Im using the stock
make.profile files from the x86 install, so I don't see why that would be,
but its food for thought.
Thanks again!
Nick
>
> Cheers,
>
> Trevor
--
Nick W ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Registered Linux User #324288 (http://counter.li.org)
MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo: foolish_gambit
ICQ: 303276221
