I'm looking at setting up a new server and am curious how exactly kolab will 
deal with virtual domains. Will you be able to set up "virtual groupware"? 
Not that I think that would be particularly efficient, but I'm curious.

Nick


On Sunday 08 January 2006 6:14 pm, Andrew J. Kopciuch wrote:
> > other things for you.  But it does have some limits.  First, Kolab as it
> > stands right now does not support virtual domains.  Second, it installs
> > into a chrooted environment (good for security), and this environment
> > captures port 80, as well as the various email/pop3/imap ports.  This
> > means that you cannot easily install Kolab onto a box with an existing
> > web server.  Ideally though, email should be on a separate server
> > anyways, so this may not be much of a problem for some.
>
> That is actually not true.  Kolab supports virtual domains ... because
> postfix does.  Kolab does not support multiple virtual domains in the
> default setup in the current stable release of the server.  You have to
> configure the setup yourself as you normally would with a postfix server. 
> It does become slightly more complicated to setup because you have to know
> how Kolab works internally.  Many people have done it already, but it is
> not the easiest task to accomplish.
>
> Multiple domain support is available in the development snapshots, and beta
> releases for version 2.1
>
> As for the ports ... it is quite simple to change the ports Kolab services
> run on to avoid this conflict.  I do it all the time.  It runs apache, so
> just like any other apache configuration, you can modify the Listen
> directives and the host settings to use an alternate port.
>
> As for mail + web running on the same server ... that's perfectly
> acceptable. Should we run a different server for ftp, and a different
> server for DNS, and a different server for samba shares or SVN or CVS as
> well?  If you have the resources and ability to combine services onto the
> same machine I would think you would make use of that instead of having
> underutilized machines.  If the situation demands a dedicated server ... by
> all means.  There is no harm is running them all together though.
>
> Andy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to