That's what I was thinking of.
Either that, or just smoothwall - either way, it'd offload the firewall portion of the tasks and let the router concentrate on what it's best at.
but it does mean that another machine needs to be there.
On 4/4/06, timmy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Check this out:
http://www.m0n0.ch/wall
Can run on your own hardware, whatever specifications you require.
Cisco would be an excellent choice, though it can get quite pricy when
you want to run the IOS firewall feature set. Another option over the
804 would be the PIX 501 or 506e.
Another one I have used and liked is the SofaWare appliance:
http://www.sofaware.com/general.aspx?boneID=145&objID=194
cheers,
tim
shane wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I wonder what the group would suggest for a router that meets the following
>specs:
>
>--up to 20 ethernet clients
>--port forwarding
>--NAT
>--Firewall
>--Easy configuration/use, http control panel
>-- VPN, QOS, Traffic Shaping, etc not required
>--128 MB ram +
>
>My current router seems to get swamped at certain times of day.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>Shane
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>clug-talk mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
>Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
>**Please remove these lines when replying
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines ( http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying
_______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
