I am actually disturbed about the prospect of censoring someone off the list for expressing themselves. A society is most healthy when there is a free discourse of ideas.
So he is not willing to listen! Is that the transgression that warrants him being silenced? You would have to silence half of humanity if that were what it took to be censored. Let cooler heads prevail! On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:23 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Could we please look at removing Juan-ita from the list * banning him! > > > > > > I too think that it is too harsh to ban people from the list, it is also > quite impractical as any 'offenders' with just register under a different > email and be tempted to cause more of a problem. > > If the exec feel they want to discuss/implement this then that discussion > should be held behind closed doors. I really hope that this is never > required on the CLUG mailing list/website. > > I (for one) am obviously getting annoyed by a 'discussion' which is > getting nowhere (other than from keeping my email folder full) and would > prefer if all parties would 'cease and desist'. > > What people need to realise is that this is a public list which is > forwarded to many people, and it is archived (and indexed by web search > engines). So remember, Google remembers forever and first impressions are > hard to break.... > > Cheers, > Simon. > > > _______________________________________________ > clug-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) > **Please remove these lines when replying >
_______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
