On 07/13/2012 10:08 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote: > On 07/13/2012 12:08 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >> Hi Ryan, >> >> only one comment here.. many times we have been asked to implement >> "interface" parameter to allow any random IP on any specific interface >> (beside the pre configured ip on that interface). > > We haven't done that because we might end up owning routing. However, > if we make it explicit that this is not the case, then we could in > theory do both.
hmm right.. forgot about that. I would still prefer to avoid the use of interface="" option if possible tho. Maybe something slightly less overloaded. force_interface or force_net_device. Fabio