On 07/14/2012 03:54 PM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: > On 07/13/2012 10:08 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote: >> On 07/13/2012 12:08 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >>> Hi Ryan, >>> >>> only one comment here.. many times we have been asked to implement >>> "interface" parameter to allow any random IP on any specific interface >>> (beside the pre configured ip on that interface). >> >> We haven't done that because we might end up owning routing. However, >> if we make it explicit that this is not the case, then we could in >> theory do both. > > hmm right.. forgot about that. > > I would still prefer to avoid the use of interface="" option if possible > tho. Maybe something slightly less overloaded. force_interface or > force_net_device. >
Sure; that's fine. prefer_interface="" maybe? "If more than one match, use this one, otherwise, use the one that matches" -- Lon
