On 07/20/2012 11:07 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote: > On 07/14/2012 03:54 PM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >> On 07/13/2012 10:08 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote: >>> On 07/13/2012 12:08 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >>>> Hi Ryan, >>>> >>>> only one comment here.. many times we have been asked to implement >>>> "interface" parameter to allow any random IP on any specific interface >>>> (beside the pre configured ip on that interface). >>> >>> We haven't done that because we might end up owning routing. However, >>> if we make it explicit that this is not the case, then we could in >>> theory do both. >> >> hmm right.. forgot about that. >> >> I would still prefer to avoid the use of interface="" option if possible >> tho. Maybe something slightly less overloaded. force_interface or >> force_net_device. >> > > Sure; that's fine. > > prefer_interface="" > > maybe? "If more than one match, use this one, otherwise, use the one > that matches"
Yes that sounds a lot better than force_* :) Thanks Fabio