Hi, By the way, I found that clutter_actor_destroy calls clutter_actor_unparent only if the parent is a container. If the parent is just an other actor (so it is a composite one) clutter_actor_unparent is not called on the child. However g_object_dipose is called in both case.
Is this intensional? I am just worry about to call dispose on an actor we are still using as child of other. Or we just should not use clutter_actor_destroy for actors in use by some parent actor? Or may be I missed something? Br, Peter Csaszar
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
