On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:14:53AM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > In CMake tarball, Copyright.txt reads: > > [...] > * Modified source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must > not be misrepresented as being the original software. > [...] > > But at the same time source file headers advertise > http://www.cmake.org/HTML/Copyright.html which has no such clause. > > > This clause causes issues as it's incompatible with the GPL (QT's > license), hence we cannot distribute the cmake GUI in Debian right now > because of that. So what should I believe ? The Website, or the tarball ?
Hmmm I understand this isn't a very sexy question, but the answer is quite important for the viability of the GUI, if the mailing list isn't the place, who can I contact about that ? -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpM7pQmKQGfq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
