On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:38:10PM +0000, Bill Hoffman wrote: > Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:14:53AM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >> In CMake tarball, Copyright.txt reads: > >> > >>[...] > >> * Modified source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must > >> not be misrepresented as being the original software. > >>[...] > >> > >> But at the same time source file headers advertise > >>http://www.cmake.org/HTML/Copyright.html which has no such clause. > >> > >> > >> This clause causes issues as it's incompatible with the GPL (QT's > >>license), hence we cannot distribute the cmake GUI in Debian right now > >>because of that. So what should I believe ? The Website, or the tarball > >>? > > Hmmm I understand this isn't a very sexy question, but the answer is > >quite important for the viability of the GUI, if the mailing list isn't > >the place, who can I contact about that ? > > We are going to change all licenses for CMake to pure BSD style licenses. > I have not yet done that, but will try to get it done sooner than later.
I hope you'll do that before Debian enters its feature freeze then :) THanks for your answer. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpUpKXo6sc99.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
