Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:38:10PM +0000, Bill Hoffman wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:14:53AM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
In CMake tarball, Copyright.txt reads:
[...]
* Modified source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must
not be misrepresented as being the original software.
[...]
But at the same time source file headers advertise
http://www.cmake.org/HTML/Copyright.html which has no such clause.
This clause causes issues as it's incompatible with the GPL (QT's
license), hence we cannot distribute the cmake GUI in Debian right now
because of that. So what should I believe ? The Website, or the tarball
?
Hmmm I understand this isn't a very sexy question, but the answer is
quite important for the viability of the GUI, if the mailing list isn't
the place, who can I contact about that ?
We are going to change all licenses for CMake to pure BSD style licenses.
I have not yet done that, but will try to get it done sooner than later.
I hope you'll do that before Debian enters its feature freeze then :)
When is the feature freeze?
-Bill
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
