|
In a message dated 2/15/2004 10:46:04 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This has been my thinking as well! Shouldn't we continue to code the infectious process per the instruction for I2, as long as it is currently affecting the resident's status and we are monitoring and documenting how it's affecting them-V/S, oxygen-use as it occurs, labs including WBC, respiratory status and S/S such as SOB/weakness/poor endurance affecting ADLs, etc.?? If the infection has cleared d/t ABT completion, WBCs wouldn't continue to be elevated.
|
- Re: Dave Audit Sally Murphy
- Re: Dave Audit Nathan
- Re: Dave Audit Sally Murphy
- Re: Dave Audit Nathan
- Re: Dave Audit MDS Lady
- Re: Dave Audit BRSAMI
- Re: Dave Audit Rncatfl
- Re: Dave Audit Rncatfl
- Re: Dave Audit Nathan
- Re: Dave Audit Nmcb40doc
- Re: Dave Audit Nmcb40doc
- Re: Dave Audit claudia farrell
- Re: Dave Audit DONNARNAC
- Re: Dave Audit Pjsrn95
- Re: Dave Audit RRS2000
- Re: Dave Audit Callie Larson
- Re: Dave Audit Nathan
- Re: Dave Audit Delores234
- Dave audit Armds1
- Re: Dave audit: Transcript of kickoff call finally av... Caralyn Davis
- Re: Dave audit Gail Neustadt
