Hi Erwin, >>Instead of using WYSIWYG-editors (none of them quite right >>at the moment) If you have some specific feedback/suggestions, please let me know. I am with the XStandard dev team.
Matt wrote: >I'm not sure if you can have more than one wysiwyg [XStandard] >box per page... Yes, you can. Matt wrote: >I'm looking for a standard's compliant WYSIWYG XHTML editor > ... should run directly from the browser Don't think this is possible without a plug-in. The in-browser editors are not standards compliant. The one in IE is based on a really old version of FrontPage which is an HTML 4 editor and I believe has not been updated in years. Also, authoring the same content using IE and Firefox editors generates very different markup. IE favours the <FONT> tag and Firefox favours inline CSS. Julian wrote: >I dont know if this [XStandard] works in Mac The OS X version is still in development. We hope to have a beta in a few months. Regards, -Vlad http://xstandard.com -------- Original Message -------- From: Erwin Heiser Date: 8/28/2005 8:29 PM > Hi all, > > Instead of using WYSIWYG-editors (none of them quite right at the moment, > although some show promise), has anyone ever showed and/or taught their > clients Textile ( http://www.textism.com/tools/textile/ )? > I mean, it can literally be picked up in a matter of minutes and ouputs the > cleanest XHTML possible. > It's also available as a plugin for Expression Engine, Wordpress, > Textpattern and probably more... > Your thoughts? > > Cheers, > > Erwin Heiser > > > ********************************************************* > The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > ********************************************************* > > ********************************************************* The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *********************************************************
