Paul Noone wrote: > Semantics, semantics. Contribute is used for client-side WYSIWYG content > publishing across an enterprise. It may not fit with the current > browser-based varietals currently in abundance but it is still a system used > to manage content, albeit one which is dependent on Dreamwever templates.
Respectfully, I think it's really stretching the definition beyond the bounds to characterize Contribute as a "CMS". I can edit and publish content using jEdit or emacs -- what's the diff? Contribute creates no change logs or audit trail, does no version tracking, has no innate concept of a site's architecture, and so on... Interwoven's TeamSite is a CMS. Documentum is a CMS. ATG Dynamo is a CMS. There's a *lot* of software I see called a "CMS" on this and other lists that make me have to bite my tongue big time -- but Contribute? It's an editor. IMHO :-) And yes, YMMV (as you guessed) -- Hassan Schroeder ----------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. ********************************************************* The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *********************************************************
