Hassan Schroeder wrote:
I agree with you, that if you want to express your granular content with
this definition, you have to write your own schema. In certain
situations this could be the option to adopt, but in many large
organisations, where there are many departments, many complex documents
for both intranet and internet publication, ODF and similar would
provide ...
Well, let's agree to disagree -- you're document-focused, and I'm
data-focused. I don't consider "documents" as input to a CMS, nor
something stored in a CMS -- data stored in the CMS can be *output*
as a document of some sort. But user-created documents, in my own
experience, *never* contain any content semantics, nor do I see a
way for that to happen.
Saying that I am document is a misassumption. I'm not disagreeing with
some of your points, some are quite valid, but I find many of the
conclusions you draw to be extreme to the point of making bold
statements which fall down because they do not encompass what they have
implied.
--------------
Geoff Deering
*********************************************************
The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*********************************************************
