On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 09:05:07AM -0800, James A. Crippen wrote: > Also, how is CMUCL's CLX going to be synchronized with the CLOCC > version? Since the CLOCC version uses PORT I don't see it being > possible to literally copy the CLOCC CLX over the CMUCL sources. But > I'd rather use CLX without the CLOCC PORT stuff, if I can get away > with it...
The clocc/clx sources are going to lose the port interface as soon as I have the time to rip it out. Converting ip's from int32 <-> vectors <-> lists serveral times is not my idea of a good time. > I'm curious about this because I'm thinking of extending various parts > of CLX to bring it up to a more modern X protocol interface and would > like to see these hacks be fed back into the distribution, but it'd be > a PITA to have to maintain them for multiple flavors of the same code. > So what's the plan here? I already have some shape-code in the clocc/clx version. If you send patches I would be happy to accept them. Not only for extentions but also to make clocc/clx more "plug-in" compatible with cmucl/clx. The final goal is to have only one clx sourcebase for all lisp, but I'm a long way away from that target :-( Groetjes, Peter -- It's logic Jim, but not as we know it. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] "God, root, what is difference?" - Pitr| "God is more forgiving." - Dave Aronson| http://cvs2.cons.org/~pvaneynd/
