On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Hannu Rummukainen wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > Well, this is what my quiz questionw as about: who can locate the > > correct flags in the crappy glibc documentation within 30 minutes? > > Yeah, the glibc documentation does not seem to be as clear as the links > I mentioned in my previous message. However glibc appears to support the > standard interfaces, so the definitions > -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > should be sufficient to replace the default file access interface with > 64-bit versions for the foreseeable future. _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE is not > needed unless you specifically want to use open64 and other similarly > named "transitional interfaces". But we're not using the header files :)
Perhaps on Linux we need to go through C stub functions that are affected by the header files. Tim
