Dennis,

ORR EZ is much more sophosticated, using VPP predicitons and ratings for
different courses and wind conditions.  It should be more fair.

<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:33 PM Randy Stafford via CnC-List <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Dennis,
>
> No experience with ORR-EZ yet, but it looks like another good option by
> which to score mixed fleet races (i.e. not one-design fleet races).
>
> Last year Colorado Sail & Yacht Club experimented with National Handicap
> for Cruisers (see https://www.rya.org.uk/racing/pages/nhc.aspx).  We
> still used PHRF as the official scoring system, but also scored the same
> races by NHC to see the outcome of applying a different scoring system to
> the same race results.  We could do the same with ORR-EZ.
>
> The proponents of this idea were looking for a scoring system that is more
> “fair” than PHRF.  I liken NHC to golf handicapping: your handicap changes
> with every scorecard you turn in, conceptually.  So it dynamically reflects
> variability in weather conditions and crew performance, which a static PHRF
> rating doesn’t.  ORR-EZ appears to have some similar elements (observed
> performance factor, configurablity per race course, etc.) which in my
> opinion are valuable.
>
> With a 30 MK I my results in my fleet are generally dependent on wind
> strength.  The stronger the wind, the better I place, all other things
> being equal.  In light air boats with less displacement beat me.  It’s
> almost as if boats should have different ratings for different wind speed
> ranges.
>
> On a related note, my RSA is re-rating all boats in its region this year,
> and Grenadine’s PHRF rating is likely to come out 12 seconds lower.  But at
> least one of my competitor’s ratings will stay the same - which exacerbates
> the above problem, unless we have a really windy season.  I think I’ll
> start a separate thread on 30 MK I PHRF ratings, because I see 18 seconds
> variability across RSAs.
>
> Cheers,
> Randy
>
> > On Jun 10, 2019, at 10:53 AM, Dennis C. via CnC-List <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > My handicapping authority, Gulf Yachting Association, like other
> authorities, is toying with ORR-EZ.  They're scoring some regattas and/or
> classes under both systems.
> >
> > I haven't explored the cost/effort of getting a ORR-EZ certificate yet.
> What's folks experience with ORR-EZ so far?
> >
> > Dennis C.
> > Touche' 35-1 #83
> > Mandeville, LA
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>

-- 
Joel
301 541 8551
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to