Tom:
You will get differing views on end for end or dip pole. Personally, I
prefer the dip pole method......maybe that is because I was the bowman
on different boats including a 1985 C&C 33 MKII where we only did the
dip pole method.
Dip pole is especially better in heavier air, by better I mean safer and
way easier to accomplish.....there is no struggling or danger to the
bowman if done right. I always positioned myself in front of the
forestay between it and bow pulpit squatting down, not standing up with
my chest virtually resting against the forestay .....lazy guy in one
hand ready to receive the pole as it comes down and across with the
other hand.
When it is choreographed correctly, it is a smooth, safe and effective
means of controlling the chute in all conditions.
Rob Abbott
AZURA
C&C 32- #277
Halifax, N.S.
*From:*CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] *On Behalf Of
*Tom Lynch via CnC-List
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 12, 2019 4:23 PM
*To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
*Cc:* Tom Lynch
*Subject:* Stus-List Spinnaker
Hi all,
I’m looking advice/recommendations on symmetrical spinnaker jibing on
my 33 MK II
I’ve got a single set of spinnaker sheets
Should a deploy and add lazy sheets and guys?
Or use a twinning line barber hauling system
How to handle the baby stay? Should I disconnect it and To facilitate
a Pole dip or do pole end for end jibing.
Appreciate anyone’s thoughts and opinions on this subject.
Tom Lynch
IndoIrish
C&C 33 MK II
Bayfield Wisconsin.
_______________________________________________
Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and
every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal
to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
_______________________________________________
Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and
every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal
to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
