With the higher gear ratio you will likely want to increase the pitch on your 
prop to maintain the same load on your engine. 
This is what I wrote about changing the whole engine in my 40:
https://www.cruisingworld.com/new-engine-for-an-old-boat/
Andy

Andrew Burton
26 Beacon Hill
Newport, RI 
USA    02840

www.burtonsailing.com
http://sites.google.com/site/andrewburtonyachtservices/
+401 965-5260

> On Jan 1, 2020, at 17:02, ALAN BERGEN via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Because of the higher gear ratio, you'll have to run the engine faster to get 
> the same boat speed as you do with your present transmission - theoretically 
> about twenty-two percent faster (2.61 divided by 2.14 times 100%). You'll be 
> using significantly more fuel, and you also may not be able to reach maximum 
> boat speed without exceeding maximum rated engine speed.
> 
> Alan Bergen
> 35 Mk III Thirsty
> Rose City YC
> Portland, OR
> 
>> On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:44 PM Olivier Chatot via CnC-List 
>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I have an interesting situation with my transmission. I would like to share 
>> it with you and get some opinions.
>> 
>> I have a Yanmar 3HM35F engine with a Kanzaki KBW10 transmission. I need to 
>> replace this transmission because it's been malfunctioning.
>> 
>> Someone near me has a new Kanzaki KM3P for sale. I believe the mounting 
>> flange is the same shape and size, so physically mounting this transmision 
>> would be possible.
>> 
>> However, this transmission has a different gear ratio than my old 
>> transmission. My old transmission has a gear ratio of 2.14 (2.50 in reverse) 
>> and the new transmission has a gear ratio of 2.61 (3.16 in reverse). Since 
>> the gear ratio of the new transmission is higher, the prop would turn more 
>> slowly. But I believe it would be safe.
>> 
>> Do you agree that it would be safe to use a transmission with a higher gear 
>> ratio? Or, do you see something important I'm missing?
>> 
>> Other specs of the two transmissions are identical. Notably, the rotation 
>> direction of the two transmissions are the same.
>> 
>> Any comment is greatly appreciated.
>> 
>> Olivier Chatot
>> C&C 38-3
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
>> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
>> PayPal to send contribution --   
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.paypal.me_stumurray&d=DwICAg&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=9w3G7Cf8YfQnrjmtuNxwDJYr3JMv9f1pAfgAJ9xXYQQ&m=AC2dODSM47hr4vAzmXP9EkP0VLDkXXrBUDfAjpE30AM&s=eeheZjpDsiFMg3A5qlYm38IsqCdXYT5Lo5ksBQ-tLJ8&e=
>>  
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> 
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to