Thanks All - appreciate the knowledge sharing of this group.

/John

> On Jun 4, 2026, at 10:12 AM, CHARLES SCHEAFFER <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi John,
> A feathering prop is a must.  I would recommend getting a MaxProp Easy but 
> try and keep the larger diameter and three blade will have more bite.  If you 
> race, a two blade will have less drag, but a three blade will power better 
> thru chop and headwinds. 
>  
> I changed from a 16" Eliptic folding prop to a two blade featering MaxProp 
> and PYI sized it to 15".    That was in 2004.  It still works fine until I 
> try to push through 25 knot headwinds and the chop that comes with that.  
> That's when I wish I had the bigger diameter and more blade area.  Otherwise 
> I love the prop.  When we race, we line up marks between the coupling and 
> transmission so the blades are verticle for least amount of drag.
>  
> Chuck Scheaffer, Resolute 1989 C&C 34R, Pasadena, Md
>> On 06/03/2026 10:48 PM EDT John Christopher via CnC-List 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  
>>  
>> Hi,
>>  
>> I have an 83 LF38 with a fixed 2-blade 16” diameter with 13” pitch. I am 
>> thinking of getting a feathering prop. I have a Westerbeke 27 with a Hurth 
>> HBW-150 VDrive 2:1.1 that is rated at 30hp at 3000 RPM.
>>  
>> I was wondering if I should maintain a 16” diameter or reduce to a 15” so I 
>> searched at the recommendation says reduce to 15”. It got me curious to know 
>> what some of you have done having bought feathering / folding props.
>>  
>> Also, would the engine stall trying to put it in forward or reverse if the 
>> prop was too big assuming it had clearances.
>>  
>> /John
>> Please help cover the costs of maintaining this list by making a small 
>> contribution using PayPal at: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/stumurray All 
>> contributions are greatly appreciated.
Please help cover the costs of maintaining this list by making a small 
contribution using PayPal at:  https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/stumurray  All 
contributions are greatly appreciated.

Reply via email to