> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 06:29:38 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm very disapointed for the sun attitude about security > upgrade of the cobalt. When there is important holes (like in > PHP these days), they MUST provide upgrade in the hours like > all Linux, *BSD, Unix system have do. If you install unoficial > packages, you can loose warranty, and if I have choosed the > cobalt is to have a minimum administration: warning from sun on > security issue, and a link to a package that correct the > problem.
IANAL, but I should think Cobalt would have to prove that you screwed up your system to void the warranty... it would be an interesting court case to hear a company claim that the warranty was void because someone manually fixed something that the vendor negligently failed to. I don't know. I wish I could figure out what Sun/Cobalt is doing. I'd have thought that they'd put US/IIi or US/IIe chips in a new release of RaQ... if Cobalt could move MIPS chips, surely Sun/Cobalt could move some UltraSPARCs. Think Netra/T1 with GUI admin -- sans proprietary, expensive, goofy memory boards. Eddy Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
