Paul Jacobs wrote: > That's because Oracle is no match for SQL 2000 on win2K or on the .NET > server platform!
Thanks for letting us know of your bias. Now we know what to think of your posts <smile>. What does this have to do with cobalt security. Nothing? I thought so. Thank you for doing your part to end this useless thread. The next time you find someone hosting a system that could benefit from any perceived advantage of running SQL2000/W2k or SQL2000/.Net, be sure to sell them on a dedicated solution; they'd get better results from a dedicated solution far before they'd see benefits from switching to shared hosting on any platform. Since the RaQs are designed for a shared-hosting platform none of this is on topic. Again, let's end this useless thread. Jeff -- Jeff Lasman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting nobaloney.net P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 voice: (909) 778-9980 * fax: (702) 548-9484 _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
