On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Bogdan Costescu wrote: > For me, adding httpd to the mix or using cobbler for mirroring the repos is > not a good solution. Should I file a RFE or is such a setup not interesting ?
OK, I guess that I should take the silence as a negative answer... But I'll venture to ask one more question. First some more details: I have tried to define a repo in the first place to be able to: - use the feature to automatically add yum repos to the installed system (cobbler profile --repos 'x y z'); however, the current setup without running 'cobbler reposync' gives an empty cobbler-config.repo just as in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477284 - based on the possibility to add repos, install func from EPEL and allow cobbler to take care of the integration with func, as this is not yet part of the main repo (for CentOS & RHEL) I do have workarounds (kickstart templates or snippets) for both of these. So now the question: is there anything else that I would miss if I don't define repos in cobbler ? -- Bogdan Costescu IWR, University of Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 54 8240, Fax: +49 6221 54 8850 E-mail: [email protected] _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
