Time out everyone. First of all, Happy Holidays to everyone! We must have a LOT of newer birders in Colorado. I say this because “back in the day”, we went birding for the fun of it and we called each other with our good bird sightings. Sharing “our” good bird with others was enough “confirmation”, we did not need a “reviewer” to validate our birding abilities.
Personally, when I find a bird that flags as rare, I document it such that an eBird reviewer (tomorrow, next year or next decade) will not need to contact me. I attach photographs, sound recordings and/or write a *detailed* description OF THE BIRD (not that is flying, or that it is perched on a twig, but exactly what it looked like and how it might have differed from “the picture in the book”). The description should be detailed enough that it stands the “test of time”. A future researcher maybe 100 or 200 years from now (that has no idea what your birding skill-set was like) can also review your evidence and determine you saw what you said you saw. Describe the *bird* *and* then eliminate similarly appearing species. THEN, and here’s the *MOST** important part*, DON’T LOOK BACK! Move forward, get out for the joy and fun of birding, not because you NEED reassurance that you are a good birder or to see your name in “lights”, but because birding is FUN! As for the number of eBird reviewers, these are volunteers and finding people that have the historical background of Colorado (and county) birds, bird identification skills, *a thick skin* and WANT to do review is difficult. In the past we’ve had reviewers that literally accepted just about EVERY bird (contrary to the evidence supplied)! I (and likely eBird) would want reviewers that can scrutinize a record, make sure a more common species was not misidentified and ensure the data is as good as possible and that sometimes means not confirming some sightings. Reviewers get burned out, some volunteering literally hundreds of hours a year doing eBird record and filter reviews. Please don’t get mad at the people reviewing your records, it helps no one. They get just as frustrated at us birders.* Birders that that don’t read the eBird rules* and submit then 30-mile-long checklists, or create a checklist that follows a trail through three habitats in the course of 5 hours, or attach a photo to the wrong species. It has GOT to be exhausting to be an eBird reviewer! How many times have you said, “Thank you” to an eBird reviewer? Then think how many times you’ve complained about them? They are doing the best they can, trust me, I know many of them. Better to just document the heck out of your rare bird, let the birding community know and *move on* to more birding fun! Happy Holidays and I hope everyone can get out and see great birds in the new year! Joey. Joey Kellner Littleton, Colorado -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en * All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. Include bird species and location in the subject line when appropriate * Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/9890905d-5a6e-4a96-bba5-69ea1d27ab12n%40googlegroups.com.
