Happy Holidays to everyone! I'll start by saying, as encouraged by Joey Kellner's post -- In Boulder County we enjoy the rapid and accurate work of volunteer Christian Nunes, thank you Christian and I hope he will continue this service to the Colorado birding community, as its helped make me a better birder.
Susan Rosine's and Diana Beatty's questions are important to consider. I hope Cornell/eBird can become more transparent in how they select eBird Reviewers and allow more birders with the right number of years of experience and skills to apply. Relying on the old boy network to identify the "right" candidates may not be adequate. Its a big birding world and many very capable birders are being overlooked as possible reviewers today is likely. Its quite accurate that many rural counties around the USA and the world, there is great disparity in the number of reviewers for rural areas. In Ithaca NY in Tomkins County, for an example , one will get a DETAILED response within TEN MINUTES of entering a rare bird species mistake, (ask me how I know! ). but for a rare data entry in Huerfano County, CO, if you do submit a photo, it may take years if it is ever confirmed. I have had solid intermediate birders in Boulder County discuss this with me endlessly and feel that maybe they should quit eBirding as they work hard to get an excellent photo of a rare bird, in a rural county, only to have that data "hidden" or "ignored" for a long time, as there is no one to look at that fine photograph to confirm it. Note that one cannot easily find unconfirmed rare bird photographs in eBird, without knowing the date, one of the observer's names, and place of entry, then finding that list for that person's name, by going to the hot spot and scrolling down to the right date, and only if at least ONE observation is unique will that data/list appear, and then one can click on he list DATE to pull it up, then voila the hidden photo is indeed there, so not hidden at all! But hard to access. If its a private spot where the rare bird was found, I am not sure how to go about finding unconfirmed photos of rare birds, and I enter data into eBird every day now for over 500 days. Another aspect of eBird reviewing that is not always transparent is how one's number of eBird entries/year of birding over time. affects what the reviewer may do! More clarity would help beginners to understand the review process more thoroughly, then they can respond appropriately, and not be afraid to enter rare bird data, given that data can be filtered out and checked for accuracy in a number of ways. Some will say that allowing applications to become reviewers may dilute the skill level of this highly trained team of birders, and, of course, the accuracy of eBird, but I would argue that not only will it NOT dilute the accuracy to have more timely attempts at review, it will IMPROVE birders at a more rapid rate as they will learn a lot becoming an eBird reviewer, and at least those clear Summer Tanager Photos in Huerfano will get a glimpse sooner and may well be quite easy to confirm. On the really tough IDs, with inadequate descriptions or blurry photos, its still a tall task for many reviewers today. And like any job, those not suited will probably resign, anyway, so its not likely to impact data quality to train more volunteer reviewers. I will send my thoughts directly to Cornell/eBird once I refine them a bit more. I welcome feedback about eBird, its purpose and how accuracy is insured, by statistics, and by eBird reviewers, privately or on this public forum. Good birding, Patricia Cullen Boulder County On Saturday, December 24, 2022 at 4:13:20 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: > How do people become eBird reviewers? Are there a set number of positions > per area? Do people apply? How can someone know if there is a need in their > area? > > Diana Beatty > El Paso County > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022, 2:58 PM David Suddjian <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I serve both as an eBird reviewer and an addicted user. >> >> I think a challenge arises when a county or region does not have someone >> who is actively reviewing all the records for that area. Then they sit in >> the queue, which can grow to 100s and 1000s. The user can't easily tell if >> a record was invalidated or is simply not reviewed. Communication is often >> lacking. The review queue soon grows very long and it is tedious and hard >> or nearly impossible for a reviewer to go back and clear out the backlog >> when new records keep coming in. Big backlogs are a problem, I think, as >> the data which should help define the filters - that which is popping the >> filters - is not reviewed maybe for a long time. >> >> I believe there are many capable birders who could review effectively >> in their familiar counties. JoAnn herself is a good one for Eagle, I'd say. >> The historical perspective is important, but most of the reviewing is of >> current records and such folks are often aware of the current status and >> distribution in their areas to catch something odd, and eBird data reveal >> the historical picture to a degree. Whether they would want to review >> for eBird, I couldn't say. But how much asking is happening? eBird's core >> data quality feature is its filters and the review process, and since >> birding and eBirding are growing, it seems the situation can only improve >> through having more people actively involved, and more communication. Now >> I'll go have fun birding :-) >> >> I will say thank you here to my home area eBird reviewer Scott Somershoe. >> I'm grateful to Scott for staying on top of things with the big review task >> here in the busily birded Denver Metro area. And thanks to all the hard >> working, labor-of-love (sort of) volunteer reviewers serving eBirders in >> Colorado. >> >> David Suddjian >> Ken Caryl Valley >> Littelton, CO >> >> On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 6:59 AM Joey Kellner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Time out everyone. First of all, Happy Holidays to everyone! >>> >>> We must have a LOT of newer birders in Colorado. I say this because >>> “back in the day”, we went birding for the fun of it and we called each >>> other with our good bird sightings. Sharing “our” good bird with >>> others was enough “confirmation”, we did not need a “reviewer” to validate >>> our birding abilities. >>> >>> Personally, when I find a bird that flags as rare, I document it such >>> that an eBird reviewer (tomorrow, next year or next decade) will not need >>> to contact me. I attach photographs, sound recordings and/or write a >>> *detailed* description OF THE BIRD (not that is flying, or that it is >>> perched on a twig, but exactly what it looked like and how it might have >>> differed from “the picture in the book”). The description should be >>> detailed enough that it stands the “test of time”. A future >>> researcher maybe 100 or 200 years from now (that has no idea what your >>> birding skill-set was like) can also review your evidence and determine you >>> saw what you said you saw. Describe the *bird* *and* then eliminate >>> similarly appearing species. THEN, and here’s the *MOST** important >>> part*, DON’T LOOK BACK! Move forward, get out for the joy and fun of >>> birding, not because you NEED reassurance that you are a good birder or to >>> see your name in “lights”, but because birding is FUN! >>> >>> As for the number of eBird reviewers, these are volunteers and finding >>> people that have the historical background of Colorado (and county) birds, >>> bird identification skills, *a thick skin* and WANT to do review is >>> difficult. In the past we’ve had reviewers that literally accepted >>> just about EVERY bird (contrary to the evidence supplied)! I (and >>> likely eBird) would want reviewers that can scrutinize a record, make sure >>> a more common species was not misidentified and ensure the data is as good >>> as possible and that sometimes means not confirming some sightings. >>> Reviewers >>> get burned out, some volunteering literally hundreds of hours a year doing >>> eBird record and filter reviews. Please don’t get mad at the people >>> reviewing your records, it helps no one. They get just as frustrated >>> at us birders.* Birders that that don’t read the eBird rules* and >>> submit then 30-mile-long checklists, or create a checklist that follows a >>> trail through three habitats in the course of 5 hours, or attach a photo to >>> the wrong species. It has GOT to be exhausting to be an eBird reviewer! >>> How many times have you said, “Thank you” to an eBird reviewer? Then >>> think how many times you’ve complained about them? They are doing the >>> best they can, trust me, I know many of them. Better to just document >>> the heck out of your rare bird, let the birding community know and *move >>> on* to more birding fun! >>> >>> Happy Holidays and I hope everyone can get out and see great birds in >>> the new year! >>> >>> Joey. >>> >>> Joey Kellner >>> >>> Littleton, Colorado >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Colorado Birds" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en >>> * All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. >>> Include bird species and location in the subject line when appropriate >>> * Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Colorado Birds" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/9890905d-5a6e-4a96-bba5-69ea1d27ab12n%40googlegroups.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/9890905d-5a6e-4a96-bba5-69ea1d27ab12n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Colorado Birds" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en >> * All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. >> Include bird species and location in the subject line when appropriate >> * Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Colorado Birds" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> > To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/CAGj6Roob%2BGMvkhqtOXZqMb6wBrpShi17ed9NR_ajOhyvhah02g%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/CAGj6Roob%2BGMvkhqtOXZqMb6wBrpShi17ed9NR_ajOhyvhah02g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds?hl=en?hl=en * All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. Include bird species and location in the subject line when appropriate * Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/CFO/Membership/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/2499b322-db02-4ccc-a903-a971673dd962n%40googlegroups.com.
